2027
|
| 11. | Meyer-Grant, Constantin G.; Kellen, David; Harding, Samuel; Singmann, Henrik: Extreme-Value Signal Detection Theory for Recognition Memory: The Parametric Road Not Taken. In: Psychological Review, Forthcoming. @article{Meyer-Grant2027,
title = {Extreme-Value Signal Detection Theory for Recognition Memory: The Parametric Road Not Taken},
author = {Constantin G. Meyer-Grant and David Kellen and Samuel Harding and Henrik Singmann},
url = {https://osf.io/qhrfj, preprint link},
year = {2027},
date = {2027-08-01},
urldate = {2025-08-01},
journal = {Psychological Review},
publisher = {OSF},
abstract = {Signal Detection Theory has long served as a cornerstone of psychological research, particularly in recognition memory. Yet its conventional application hinges almost exclusively on the Gaussian assumption—an adherence rooted more in historical convenience than theoretical necessity that comes with a number of well-documented drawbacks. In this work, we critically examine these limitations and introduce a principled parametric alternative: the Gumbel_min model, based on extreme-value distributions of event minima. A key feature of this model is its grounding in a behavioral principle of invariance under uniform choice-set expansions—a prediction we empirically validate in a novel recognition-memory experiment. We further benchmark the Gumbel_min model against its Gaussian counterpart across multiple recognition-memory tasks, including confidence-rating, ranking, forced-choice, and detection-plus-identification paradigms. Our findings highlight the model's parsimonious yet successful characterization of recognition-memory judgments, as well as the utility of its associated discriminability index, g', which can be directly computed from a single pair of hit and false-alarm rates.},
keywords = {critical tests, extreme value distributions, invariance properties, Recognition memory, signal detection theory},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Signal Detection Theory has long served as a cornerstone of psychological research, particularly in recognition memory. Yet its conventional application hinges almost exclusively on the Gaussian assumption—an adherence rooted more in historical convenience than theoretical necessity that comes with a number of well-documented drawbacks. In this work, we critically examine these limitations and introduce a principled parametric alternative: the Gumbel_min model, based on extreme-value distributions of event minima. A key feature of this model is its grounding in a behavioral principle of invariance under uniform choice-set expansions—a prediction we empirically validate in a novel recognition-memory experiment. We further benchmark the Gumbel_min model against its Gaussian counterpart across multiple recognition-memory tasks, including confidence-rating, ranking, forced-choice, and detection-plus-identification paradigms. Our findings highlight the model's parsimonious yet successful characterization of recognition-memory judgments, as well as the utility of its associated discriminability index, g', which can be directly computed from a single pair of hit and false-alarm rates. |
2025
|
| 10. | Kellen, David; Meyer-Grant, Constantin G.; Singmann, Henrik; Klauer, Karl Christoph: Critical Testing in Recognition Memory: Selective Influence, Single-Item Generalization, and the High-Threshold Hypothesis. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 51, iss. 8, pp. 1259-1280, 2025. @article{Kellen2025,
title = {Critical Testing in Recognition Memory: Selective Influence, Single-Item Generalization, and the High-Threshold Hypothesis},
author = { David Kellen and Constantin G. Meyer-Grant and Henrik Singmann and Karl Christoph Klauer },
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Kellen%20et%20al.%20-%202025%20-%20Critical%20testing%20in%20recognition%20memory%20Selective%20influence%2C%20single-item%20generalization%2C%20and%20the%20hig.pdf, publisher PDF
https://osf.io/fnsk2/download/, accepted preprint
https://osf.io/qz5re/, code on OSF
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fnsk2, PsyArXiv preprint
},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-08-01},
urldate = {2025-08-01},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
volume = {51},
issue = {8},
pages = {1259-1280},
keywords = {discrete states, mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, Recognition memory, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
| 9. | Deans-Browne, Calvin Christopher James Lee; Roth, Pia; Echterbeck, Carolin; Singmann, Henrik: Differential Memory for Belief-Congruent versus Belief-Incongruent Arguments Cannot Explain Belief-Driven Argument Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2025. @inproceedings{deans-browneDifferentialMemoryBeliefCongruent2025b,
title = {Differential Memory for Belief-Congruent versus Belief-Incongruent Arguments Cannot Explain Belief-Driven Argument Evaluation},
author = {Calvin Christopher James Lee Deans-Browne and Pia Roth and Carolin Echterbeck and Henrik Singmann},
url = {https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5nn3w7xz, CogSci Proceedings link},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-07-27},
urldate = {2025-01-01},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society},
volume = {47},
abstract = {People often rely more on their prior beliefs than the presented evidence when evaluating arguments. We investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. We hypothesise that when individuals encounter an argument that is congruent with their beliefs, it activates related information in memory. For belief-congruent arguments, people should therefore be more likely to both correctly recognise previously encountered information and incorrectly recognise new information as previously seen. To test this, we first investigated the effect of participants' beliefs about political claims on their evaluation of corresponding arguments that varied in quality. We then employed a surprise memory test to assess participants' recognition memory for these arguments. While we replicated the finding that prior beliefs drive argument evaluations, prior beliefs did not affect memory performance for all arguments in the same way. Our results indicate that individuals may use prior beliefs to aid memory only when the memory task is difficult.},
keywords = {Belief bias, Belief-based reasoning, Everyday reasoning, Informal reasoning, real-world reasoning, Reasoning, Recognition memory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
People often rely more on their prior beliefs than the presented evidence when evaluating arguments. We investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. We hypothesise that when individuals encounter an argument that is congruent with their beliefs, it activates related information in memory. For belief-congruent arguments, people should therefore be more likely to both correctly recognise previously encountered information and incorrectly recognise new information as previously seen. To test this, we first investigated the effect of participants' beliefs about political claims on their evaluation of corresponding arguments that varied in quality. We then employed a surprise memory test to assess participants' recognition memory for these arguments. While we replicated the finding that prior beliefs drive argument evaluations, prior beliefs did not affect memory performance for all arguments in the same way. Our results indicate that individuals may use prior beliefs to aid memory only when the memory task is difficult. |
2021
|
| 8. | Kellen, David; Winiger, Samuel; Dunn, John; Singmann, Henrik: Testing the Foundations of Signal Detection Theory in Recognition Memory.. In: Psychological Review, vol. 128, iss. 6, no. 1022-1050, 2021. @article{Kellen2022,
title = {Testing the Foundations of Signal Detection Theory in Recognition Memory.},
author = {David Kellen and Samuel Winiger and John Dunn and Henrik Singmann },
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/kellen-2021-sdt.pdf, publisher PDF
https://psyarxiv.com/p5rj9/, accepted preprint
https://osf.io/zw9yr/, OSF link to data and scripts},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-11-01},
urldate = {2021-11-01},
journal = {Psychological Review},
volume = {128},
number = {1022-1050},
issue = {6},
keywords = {mathematical modeling, Recognition memory, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
| 7. | Winiger, Samuel; Singmann, Henrik; Kellen, David: Bias in Confidence: A critical test for discrete-state models of visual working memory.. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 387-401, 2021. @article{Winiger2022,
title = {Bias in Confidence: A critical test for discrete-state models of visual working memory.},
author = {Samuel Winiger and Henrik Singmann and David Kellen},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Winiger-et-al.-2020-Bias-in-confidence-A-critical-test-for-discrete-s.pdf, Journal PDF
https://psyarxiv.com/6cmsp/, accepted preprint
https://osf.io/es2rw/, data, code, and materials (OSF)},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-06-01},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
volume = {47},
number = {3},
pages = {387-401},
keywords = {mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, MPT models, Recognition memory, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
2019
|
| 6. | Starns, Jeffrey J.; Cataldo, Andrea M.; Rotello, Caren M.; Annis, Jeffrey; Aschenbrenner, Andrew; Bröder, Arndt; Cox, Gregory; Criss, Amy; Curl, Ryan A.; Dobbins, Ian G.; Dunn, John; Enam, Tasnuva; Evans, Nathan J.; Farrell, Simon; Fraundorf, Scott H.; Gronlund, Scott D.; Heathcote, Andrew; Heck, Daniel W.; Hicks, Jason L.; Huff, Mark J.; Kellen, David; Key, Kylie N.; Kilic, Asli; Klauer, Karl Christoph; Kraemer, Kyle R.; Leite, Fábio P.; Lloyd, Marianne E.; Malejka, Simone; Mason, Alice; McAdoo, Ryan M.; McDonough, Ian M.; Michael, Robert B.; Mickes, Laura; Mizrak, Eda; Morgan, David P.; Mueller, Shane T.; Osth, Adam; Reynolds, Angus; Seale-Carlisle, Travis M.; Singmann, Henrik; Sloane, Jennifer F.; Smith, Andrew M.; Tillman, Gabriel; van Ravenzwaaij, Don; Weidemann, Christoph T.; Wells, Gary L.; White, Corey N.; Wilson, Jack: Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. In: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 335-349, 2019. @article{Starns2020,
title = {Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis},
author = {Jeffrey J. Starns and Andrea M. Cataldo and Caren M. Rotello and Jeffrey Annis and Andrew Aschenbrenner and Arndt Bröder and Gregory Cox and Amy Criss and Ryan A. Curl and Ian G. Dobbins and John Dunn and Tasnuva Enam and Nathan J. Evans and Simon Farrell and Scott H. Fraundorf and Scott D. Gronlund and Andrew Heathcote and Daniel W. Heck and Jason L. Hicks and Mark J. Huff and David Kellen and Kylie N. Key and Asli Kilic and Karl Christoph Klauer and Kyle R. Kraemer and Fábio P. Leite and Marianne E. Lloyd and Simone Malejka and Alice Mason and Ryan M. McAdoo and Ian M. McDonough and Robert B. Michael and Laura Mickes and Eda Mizrak and David P. Morgan and Shane T. Mueller and Adam Osth and Angus Reynolds and Travis M. Seale-Carlisle and Henrik Singmann and Jennifer F. Sloane and Andrew M. Smith and Gabriel Tillman and Don van Ravenzwaaij and Christoph T. Weidemann and Gary L. Wells and Corey N. White and Jack Wilson},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Starns-et-al.-2019-Assessing-Theoretical-Conclusions-With-Blinded-Inf.pdf, published version
http://singmann.org/download/publications/AMPPS_manuscript_revision2_Submitted.docx, accepted manuscript},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-01},
journal = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {335-349},
keywords = {mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, model selection, Recognition memory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
2018
|
| 5. | Kellen, David; Singmann, Henrik; Chen, Sharon; Winiger, Samuel: Assumption Violations in Forced-Choice Recognition Judgments: Implications from the Area Theorem. In: Rogers, Tim; Rau, Marina; Zhu, Jerry; Kalish, Chuck (Ed.): Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 598–603, Austin TX: Cognitive Science Societ, 2018. @inproceedings{Kellen2018,
title = {Assumption Violations in Forced-Choice Recognition Judgments: Implications from the Area Theorem},
author = {David Kellen and Henrik Singmann and Sharon Chen and Samuel Winiger},
editor = {Tim Rogers and Marina Rau and Jerry Zhu and Chuck Kalish},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Kellen-et-al.-2018-Assumption-Violations-in-Forced-Choice-Recognition.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-26},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
pages = {598--603},
publisher = {Austin TX: Cognitive Science Societ},
keywords = {mathematical modeling, measurement models, Recognition memory, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
|
2015
|
| 4. | Kellen, David; Singmann, Henrik; Vogt, Jan; Klauer, Karl Christoph: Further Evidence for Discrete-State Mediation in Recognition Memory. In: Experimental Psychology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 40-53, 2015. @article{kellen_further_2015,
title = {Further Evidence for Discrete-State Mediation in Recognition Memory},
author = {Kellen, David and Singmann, Henrik and Vogt, Jan and Klauer, Karl Christoph},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/2015_kellen_singmann_vogt_klauer.pdf, published article
https://osf.io/zadt6/, supplemental materials (data and code; on the Open Science Framework)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000272, link to publisher website},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-20},
journal = {Experimental Psychology},
volume = {62},
number = {1},
pages = {40-53},
keywords = {discrete states, mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, MPT models, Recognition memory, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
2013
|
| 3. | Kellen, David; Klauer, Karl Christoph; Singmann, Henrik: On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: Reply to Benjamin (2013). In: Psychological Review, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 727–730, 2013, ISSN: 0033-295X. @article{kellen_measurement_2013,
title = {On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: Reply to Benjamin (2013)},
author = {Kellen, David and Klauer, Karl Christoph and Singmann, Henrik},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Kellen%20et%20al.%20-%202013%20-%20On%20the%20measurement%20of%20criterion%20noise%20in%20signal%20de.pdf, published article},
issn = {0033-295X},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Psychological Review},
volume = {120},
number = {3},
pages = {727--730},
keywords = {criterion noise, decision noise, mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, Recognition memory, response criteria, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
| 2. | Singmann, Henrik; Kellen, David; Klauer, Karl Christoph: Investigating the Other-Race Effect of Germans towards Turks and Arabs using Multinomial Processing Tree Models. In: Knauff, Markus; Pauen, M.; Sebanz, N.; Wachsmuth, I. (Ed.): Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1330–1335, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 2013. @inproceedings{singmann_investigating_2013,
title = {Investigating the Other-Race Effect of Germans towards Turks and Arabs using Multinomial Processing Tree Models},
author = {Singmann, Henrik and Kellen, David and Klauer, Karl Christoph},
editor = {Knauff, Markus and Pauen, M. and Sebanz, N. and Wachsmuth, I.},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/SKK-CogSci2013.pdf, published article
http://singmann.org/download/publications/data-scripts/2013_singmann_kellen_klauer.zip, data and analysis script},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
pages = {1330--1335},
publisher = {Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society},
keywords = {mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, MPT models, other-race effect, Recognition memory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
|
2012
|
| 1. | Kellen, David; Klauer, Karl Christoph; Singmann, Henrik: On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory.. In: Psychological Review, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 457–479, 2012, ISSN: 1939-1471, 0033-295X. @article{kellen_measurement_2012,
title = {On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory.},
author = {Kellen, David and Klauer, Karl Christoph and Singmann, Henrik},
url = {http://singmann.org/download/publications/Kellen%20et%20al.%20-%202012%20-%20On%20the%20measurement%20of%20criterion%20noise%20in%20signal%20de.pdf, published article
http://singmann.org/download/publications/supplemental/2013_kellen_klauer_singmann.zip, supplemental materials},
issn = {1939-1471, 0033-295X},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
journal = {Psychological Review},
volume = {119},
number = {3},
pages = {457--479},
keywords = {criterion noise, decision noise, mathematical modeling, measurement models, memory, Recognition memory, response criteria, Signal detection},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|